inclusionAI Releases Six Ling-3.0 Base Checkpoints with Warmup-Stable-and-Merge Architecture

Ant Group's AI research lab, inclusionAI, has publicly released six open-weight base checkpoints for its Ling-3.0 foundation model family under the permissive MIT license. The release spans two distinct parameter scales (Ling-3.0-flash and Ling-3.0-tiny) and captures three sequential stages of the pre-alignment training pipeline. Rather than providing solely post-trained chat models, the release provides unaligned base weights designed specifically for continued pre-training, domain-specific mi

2 min
inclusionAI Releases Six Ling-3.0 Base Checkpoints with Warmup-Stable-and-Merge Architecture

Ant Group's AI research lab, inclusionAI, has publicly released six open-weight base checkpoints for its Ling-3.0 foundation model family under the permissive MIT license. The release spans two distinct parameter scales (Ling-3.0-flash and Ling-3.0-tiny) and captures three sequential stages of the pre-alignment training pipeline.

Rather than providing solely post-trained chat models, the release provides unaligned base weights designed specifically for continued pre-training, domain-specific mid-training, fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning research.

Checkpoints Across Three Training Stages

The repository structure covers two model sizes across three distinct phases of the pre-training lifecycle:

  • Pre-trained Checkpoints: Ling-3.0-flash-base-30T and Ling-3.0-tiny-base-30T reflect raw models immediately following large-scale 30-trillion-token pre-training, prior to mid-training or checkpoint merging.
  • Mid-trained Checkpoints: Ling-3.0-flash-base-midtrain and Ling-3.0-tiny-base-midtrain capture weights after mid-training data phases.
  • Merged Base Checkpoints: Ling-3.0-flash-base and Ling-3.0-tiny-base represent the final base state produced by Warmup-Stable and Merge (WSM) before post-training.

All six checkpoints are strictly base models without supervised fine-tuning, preference optimization, or safety alignment.

Warmup-Stable and Merge architecture and hybrid attention layers in Ling-3.0

The Warmup-Stable and Merge (WSM) Approach

A core architectural characteristic of the release is the replacement of conventional learning rate decay schedules with Warmup-Stable and Merge (WSM). Under standard training setups, cosine or linear learning rate decay at the end of pre-training bakes the final data distribution into model weights, making subsequent continued pre-training prone to instability or catastrophic forgetting.

Under WSM, the model trains at a stable learning rate through the end of the run. Intermediate checkpoints captured along the stable trajectory are subsequently combined using learned merge weights. This structure allows teams to:

  • Perform continued pre-training and domain-specific dataset expansion without fighting an decayed learning rate.
  • Explore alternative merge profiles offline without incurring the compute costs of full retraining runs.
  • Maintain shared training recipes between Ling-3.0-tiny (7.9B total, 1.3B active) and Ling-3.0-flash (124B total, 5.1B active), enabling rapid low-cost validation on small hardware before scaling to 124B parameters.

Architectural Specifications

Ling-3.0-flash-base uses the BailingMoeV3ForCausalLM sparse mixture-of-experts architecture:

  • Parameter Count: 124 billion non-embedding parameters (approximately 127.5 billion total parameters on disk including embedding layers), with 5.1 billion parameters activated per token.
  • MoE Routing: A 1/64 sparsity pattern across 512 routed experts, activating 8 routed experts and 1 shared expert per token.
  • Hybrid Attention: 42 transformer layers structured in a 5:1 repeating pattern, combining 35 Kimi Delta Attention (KDA) linear attention layers with 7 Gated Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA) layers.
  • Context Length: Native 256K context window (262,144 tokens).
  • Multi-Token Prediction: A 3.1-billion-parameter Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) module is included for speculative decoding workflows.
  • Licensing: Released under the MIT license without proprietary commercial restrictions.

The checkpoints are available on Hugging Face in BF16 format with inference and serving support validated in vLLM and SGLang.

Sources

Written by

More to read

  • Infinite Agentic Loops in Production: Architecture, Feedback Topologies, and Bound Verification

    Autonomous AI agents have transitioned software architectures from static, single-turn request-response patterns into stateful, iterative execution loops. Built around foundational paradigms such as ReAct (Yao et al., 2022) and implemented across frameworks including LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, and the OpenAI Agents SDK, agents repeatedly perceive environmental state, reason over intermediate goals, dispatch tool invocations, observe execution outputs, and append new observations back into their

    1 min
  • Noise-Contrastive Estimation and InfoNCE: How Partition Function Estimation and Mutual Information Lower Bounds Power Modern AI

    Noise-Contrastive Estimation and InfoNCE: How Partition Function Elimination and Mutual Information Lower Bounds Power Modern AI In statistical machine learning and generative modeling, evaluating the exact probability of an observed event frequently requires calculating a normalizing constant known as the partition function. For continuous spaces or discrete spaces with high cardinality, such as a natural language vocabulary spanning over one hundred thousand tokens or high-dimensional pixel d

    1 min
  • Agent Task Planning and Decomposition in Production: Plan-and-Solve vs. ReAct, Hierarchical Task Graphs, and Dynamic Replanning Architectures

    Autonomous AI agents deployed in production environments frequently fail when tasks require long-horizon reasoning across dozens of sequential tool calls. While single-turn tool calling is well-handled by modern frontier models, multi-step workflows introduce compounding failure modes: plan drift, unrecoverable tool exceptions, context window saturation, and premature task termination. Building resilient agent systems requires moving beyond simple prompt-driven loops. Production engineering has

    1 min