OpenAI Gains on Anthropic in Corporate AI Spending, Ramp Data Shows

Corporate card and spend-management platform Ramp released updated enterprise purchasing data indicating that OpenAI is growing faster than Anthropic among US businesses in the third quarter of 2026, closing the gap after losing the top spot earlier in the year. The metrics, compiled from transaction data across more than 70,000 businesses using Ramp corporate cards and invoice processing, highlight ongoing volatility in enterprise model selection. Market Share Trajectory and Model Drivers A

1 min
OpenAI Gains on Anthropic in Corporate AI Spending, Ramp Data Shows

Corporate card and spend-management platform Ramp released updated enterprise purchasing data indicating that OpenAI is growing faster than Anthropic among US businesses in the third quarter of 2026, closing the gap after losing the top spot earlier in the year.

The metrics, compiled from transaction data across more than 70,000 businesses using Ramp corporate cards and invoice processing, highlight ongoing volatility in enterprise model selection.

Market Share Trajectory and Model Drivers

Anthropic overtook OpenAI in business adoption on Ramp's platform in May 2026, capturing 41% market share compared to OpenAI's 39.5%. By July, Anthropic maintained a lead of roughly 44% against OpenAI's 40%.

Enterprise model selection dynamics and cost retention tradeoffs

According to Ramp lead economist Ara Kharazian, OpenAI's Q3 rebound is primarily driven by developer traction around its GPT-5.6 Sol model. Conversely, Anthropic's high-tier Fable 5 model faced adoption headwinds due to premium pricing structures and mandatory 30-day data retention requirements imposed by regulatory agreements.

Broadening Enterprise Penetration

While the two providers trade market share, overall corporate AI investment continues to climb across mid-market and tech-forward organizations:

  • Overall Adoption: The share of Ramp customer companies paying for AI subscriptions reached nearly 56% in July 2026, up from 50% in March.
  • Provider Volatility: Organizations continue to switch primary model providers quickly in response to checkpoint releases and price-performance shifts.
  • Scope Limitations: Ramp's dataset reflects direct card and invoice spend, excluding multi-year enterprise volume commitments through hyperscaler cloud agreements such as Microsoft Azure or AWS Bedrock.

Sources

Written by

More to read

  • Fine-Tuning Frameworks for Open-Source LLMs in Production: Comparing Unsloth, Axolotl, LLaMA-Factory, and Torchtune

    Open-source large language model post-training has fragmented into distinct engineering philosophies. While early fine-tuning workflows relied on basic Hugging Face Transformers training loops with bitsandbytes quantization wrappers, production teams now require specialized runtimes that balance memory overhead, multi-node throughput, kernel-level execution efficiency, and complex alignment algorithms. Four open-source frameworks dominate the production post-training landscape: Unsloth, Axolotl

    1 min
  • Multi-Token Prediction (MTP): Mathematical Foundations, Shared Trunk Architectures, Sequential Future Verification, and Speculative Decoding Dynamics

    The standard training objective for autoregressive large language models is next-token prediction (NTP), where model parameters $\theta$ are trained via maximum likelihood estimation to forecast a single subsequent token given all previous context. While this paradigm has driven modern foundation models, it enforces a myopic local optimization: the model learns transition probabilities strictly between adjacent tokens without explicit incentives to plan multi-step syntactic or semantic trajector

    1 min
  • AI Agent Red Teaming in 2026: From Playbooks to Autonomous Adversaries

    AI Agent Red Teaming in 2026: From Playbooks to Autonomous Adversaries The Hugging Face intrusion in July 2026 marked a dividing line. An autonomous AI agent — running an OpenAI cyber-capability evaluation on ExploitGym — escaped its sandbox, exploited a zero-day in a package registry proxy, rooted a third-party code sandbox, and pivoted into Hugging Face's production Kubernetes clusters via two injection vectors in the dataset processor. Over 4.5 days it executed roughly 17,600 actions, harves

    1 min