Google DeepMind's WeatherNext predicts cyclone tracks and intensity at the same time

Google DeepMind has introduced WeatherNext Cyclones, or WN-C, an AI system for tropical cyclone forecasting that sees about one day further into the future than leading operational models. The gain roughly matches the progress traditional weather models made over a decade. The model was built with the National Hurricane Center, the Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, and the UK Met Office. Forecasts have been running live on Google's Weather Lab since June 2025. During Hurrica

2 min
Google DeepMind's WeatherNext predicts cyclone tracks and intensity at the same time

Google DeepMind has introduced WeatherNext Cyclones, or WN-C, an AI system for tropical cyclone forecasting that sees about one day further into the future than leading operational models. The gain roughly matches the progress traditional weather models made over a decade.

The model was built with the National Hurricane Center, the Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, and the UK Met Office. Forecasts have been running live on Google's Weather Lab since June 2025. During Hurricane Melissa, which made landfall in Jamaica in 2025, the model helped the NHC predict rapid intensification in time, according to DeepMind. That is when a storm gains at least 30 knots of wind speed within 24 hours.

Solving a decades-old tradeoff

Illustration of a cyclone spiral with a forecast arrow

Cyclone forecasting has long faced a tradeoff. Global models like ECMWF's ensemble system (ENS) are strong on track prediction but too coarse for intensity. Specialized regional models like NOAA's Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) deliver more precise intensity readings but lose accuracy on the track. WN-C handles both in a single system, according to a paper published in Nature.

For a five-day forecast, the estimated storm center position is off by an average of 230 kilometers, compared to 370 for ENS and 335 for DeepMind's predecessor GenCast. On three-day intensity forecasts, WN-C is 3.75 knots more accurate than HAFS. It also scores more than twice as well as ENS and GenCast on probabilistic storm intensity forecasts across many lead times.

Coarse data, sharper forecasts

WN-C works with a data grid where each point covers about 28 kilometers, roughly a hundred times coarser than specialized regional models. Even a compact variant at 111 kilometers per grid point stays competitive. "High resolution is not a strict prerequisite for state-of-the-art intensity forecasting," the authors write, noting that how the model extracts accurate intensity from coarse data remains an open research question.

Faster than diffusion

WN-C uses Functional Generative Networks (FGN) instead of the diffusion approach used by GenCast. Diffusion needs dozens of passes through the network per forecast step; FGN gets by with a single pass, making it eight times faster. A 15-day forecast runs in under a minute on one of Google's AI chips, so DeepMind scaled parallel runs from 50 to 1,000 per storm, which helps capture rare extreme events. The Critical Success Index, which weighs correct warnings against false alarms and missed events, jumps from below 0.3 to 0.5.

A complement, not a replacement

DeepMind says traditional numerical models still matter. The NHC typically combines several physics-based models into a weighted consensus for official forecasts. In a simulated addition to those consensus models, WN-C improves track forecasts by an average of 28 percent and intensity by about 6 percent. The smaller intensity gain shows traditional models still contribute heavily there.

DeepMind released the code and weights for both WeatherNext 2 and WeatherNext Cyclones on GitHub, and the mini variant runs on a single TPU in a free Colab notebook. The authors still point users to national weather services for official warnings: WN-C is meant to support forecasters, not replace them.

Sources

Written by

More to read

  • The Gumbel-Softmax Trick: How Continuous Relaxations Enable Differentiable Discrete Sampling

    The Gumbel-Softmax Trick: How Continuous Relaxations Enable Differentiable Discrete Sampling In modern deep learning, end-to-end training depends on reverse-mode automatic differentiation. When an architecture operates on continuous tensors, computing gradients via the chain rule is straightforward. However, many foundational artificial intelligence problems involve discrete choices: selecting tokens from a fixed vocabulary, routing tokens to expert networks in a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) archit

    1 min
  • Token Healing and Partial Token Alignment in Production LLM Serving: Architecture, Prefix Trie Rollback, and Serving Trade-Offs

    Modern large language models operate on discrete subword tokens generated by greedy compression algorithms like Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE), WordPiece, or Unigram. While subword tokenization enables high compression rates and fixed vocabulary sizes, it introduces a structural defect at the interface between raw user text and autoregressive inference: the partial token problem, commonly known as the prompt boundary problem. When a user prompt terminates mid-token or at a punctuation boundary that c

    1 min
  • Flow Matching for Generative Modeling: How Continuous Normalizing Flows and Optimal Transport Paths Replace Diffusion SDEs

    Flow Matching for Generative Modeling: How Continuous Normalizing Flows and Optimal Transport Paths Replace Diffusion SDEs Generative modeling underwent a structural shift with the introduction of Flow Matching (FM), formulated independently by Lipman et al. (2022), Albergo and Vanden-Eijnden (2022), and Liu et al. (2022). While Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPM) and score-based Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs) established state-of-the-art sample quality across vision and a

    1 min